One Scene that caught my eye was a scene where the twins are in air ducts climbing to reach their next target. the two fall but are caught by a rope. Spinning, the two take out every target. The colors here are one of the main references to Tarantino's style of violence. Everything in the room is white or cream to contrast the red of the blood. Once everyone is shot besides the boss, blood is pouring out of the dead bodies bright red. The twins get the boss on his knees and angle their guns so their bullets go out through his eyes. Once dead the red and black residue where his eyes once were is displayed on screen. All the men in this scene have on some sort of white shirt to help make the blood pop out even more.
Michael L Film Studies Blog
Thursday, May 16, 2013
MYST Post 6: The Boondock Saints
One Scene that caught my eye was a scene where the twins are in air ducts climbing to reach their next target. the two fall but are caught by a rope. Spinning, the two take out every target. The colors here are one of the main references to Tarantino's style of violence. Everything in the room is white or cream to contrast the red of the blood. Once everyone is shot besides the boss, blood is pouring out of the dead bodies bright red. The twins get the boss on his knees and angle their guns so their bullets go out through his eyes. Once dead the red and black residue where his eyes once were is displayed on screen. All the men in this scene have on some sort of white shirt to help make the blood pop out even more.
MYST Post 5: A Bronx Tale

I give this movie 4 out of 4 stars. It was entertaining throughout, and had great character development. This film had similar qualities to films like Casino and Goodfellas. Though this movie was directed and starred in by the same person, the writer was also Chaz Palminteri, who played Sunny. The Deniro influence is prevalent throughout this film. He tends to like to add plenty of drama and unforeseen twists in his films. When "C" is feeling happy and there is a joyful tone and the lighting is bright.
As far as genre, this film is similar to many Scorsese films. The style is also similar in the way it tells the narrative. It includes lots of character development and unexpected twists. The lighting in the movie is interesting at times and also typical at times. The film uses a lot of dark scenes to create an ominous feel.
In this film there is one particular interesting cinematic scene. "C" goes to see Sunny for the first time as a kid. Sunny is in his usual hangout at a table. The lighting is dark. Though it is not Godfather dark, it is dark nonetheless. There is a cloud of smoke as "C" walks in. There is a low angle shot looking up to Sunny as he begins to talk to "C" for the first time. This helps show the importance of Sunny.Overall, I recommend this film to anyone interested in dramas or Italian mafia films. It tells a good story and is relatively easy to follow. An interesting note for Chaz Palminteri fans is that this film is semi-autobiographical.
Thursday, May 2, 2013
1975 Create a Movie Project
The studio chosen to produce this film is 20th Century Fox. This decision was made for various financial reasons. At this point in time this studio had broadened it's investments. This gave it the financial backing to invest in higher budget films. It helped make Star Wars possible when other studios denied the script. This would give them the potential to invest in this high budget film.
Monday, April 29, 2013
Formal Film Study: Tarantino
The overarching theme I discovered throughout Tarantino's films was his belief in character development. In each film there is at least one character that the viewer becomes attached to. In Reservoir Dogs, there were two. Mr. Blue is someone who is followed the entire film. He is shown to have good character even though he is a thief. He tries to help his partner who is shot and refuses to leave him in the warehouse. The viewer continues to learn more and more about him and how he got into the situation he is in. The other person whom the viewer sees develop is the man who is shot. At first he seems to be just one of the thieves and the viewer is rooting for him to live. Then later, when it is discovered that he is an undercover cop, the viewer turns against him. This seems to be the opposite of most films where the viewer is against the forces of good and is even mad that they are relatively successful. In Hostel, only one person does the viewer see develop. That is Paxton whom the viewer learns has a past experience with death. This causes him to not be able to leave the Asian woman in the chambers. He goes from being the average mid twenties tourist to a hero. In Django Unchained, Django goes from being the average slave to a brutal bounty hunter who will do anything to rescue his wife from the evil plantation owners. The viewer also sees the German bounty hunter also develop to a lesser extent. In the three Tarantino films mentioned, each displays a different culture. Django shows some of the brutal truth of pre civil war southern culture. It appears Tarantino felt some of the brutality that really occurred was important to show. Also, in the scene in which the masked men try to murder both Django and the bounty hinter shows how opposed southern culture was to support for anti-slavery movements and individuals. The whipping scenes show how cold hearted some of the plantation owners could be. Some of the language used about the slaves by the southern people shows how the really viewed the slaves as objects and not people. In hostel, the child gang was an interesting way to show some of the poverty that existed throughout the setting. Also, certain sights and scenery was displayed throughout the various places they travelled as well as the difference in laws.
The last thing I discovered was Trantino's reluctance to use the typical Hollywood ending. He was not afraid to get the viewer to believe that it could happen and then decisively rid of that notion with the ending of the film. the style is particularly interesting because few people are willing to do this type of ending because of the fear of negative public reaction however, clearly Tarantino does not feel that way. This is shown with the seat of everyone in Reservoir dogs to end the film as well as the suicide by the Asian woman after she has nearly escaped. These were two unpredictable and surprising endings. Overall, Tarantino did a great job with each film. He was able to keep the viewer interested while making an impact on the viewer as well.
Friday, April 12, 2013
MYST Post #4 Stand Up Guys
In this film, Walken and Pacino get together in their old age to create a new type of gangster film. This gangster film does not rely on violence to grab a viewers attention. This film is interesting because of it's plot. In Stand Up Guys, Val (Pacino) has just been released from prison after a 28 year stint in prison. He and Doc (Walken) are the only two of their old crew that have stayed in touch over the years. Doc sent Val care packages and paintings while he was in prison. Once Val is out, he wants to get back to his old partying ways. Doc assists Val while he is on his partying
surge. Val quickly realizes that he is not the same as when he was younger. Meanwhile, Doc has orders to take out Val
from a mafia boss. Val was sent to prison because he had murdered the Mafia Boss' son accidentally during a robbery gone wrong. Doc does not want to kill Val, but has to do it on 24 hours. Val quickly realizes Doc's situation and is beginning to accept that he only has 24 hours left to live. The two try to come up with solutions while at dinner at a diner. At the diner, Val meets Doc's friend who is a waitress at the diner. Val learns that Doc is a regular customer at the diner. Later it is found out that the waitress is Doc's granddaughter but she does not know. Val and Doc meet up with some of the old crew and find a girl in the trunk of a car they stole. The girl explains she has been kidnapped by some "punks." Val and Doc decide to bring street justice to them. The enter in the guys compound where 5 men are staying. They eventually tie the men up and leave them to the women who now has a baseball bat. Afterwards, Doc and Val have bonded and there is now no way Doc can kill Val. The two decide to try to kill the mafia boss. Before the shootout, Doc leaves a letter for the waitress explaining the situation, and some money that he has left her.

I give this movie 3 out of 4 stars. The plot is interesting but the ending could have been better. Critics have a wide range of ratings on this film as well. This film is much different than typical Scorscese and Tarantino gangster films. Profanity and violence are not heavily used. The film tries to rely on plot to peak the viewers interest. I personally liked it because I am a fan of both Pacino and Walken. If you are not a fan of these two than this film would not be particularly interesting to you. I thought that as these two begin to get up in age, that is was cool that they made a movie about it but showed how they still have a roughness about them.
One scene that was particularly interesting to me, is the scene in which Walken and Pacino are picking out new suits. The two have broken into an expensive suit shop without tripping an alarm. They have all the time they need to pick out new suits. There is an irony about the situation. Pacino at this point is picking out what may be the clothes he dies in. Walken is resistant to change and is reluctant to pick out a new suit. This scene touches the emotions of the viewer because time is running out for Val. Val is beginning to become saddened by the situation and this emotion is extended to the viewer. This scene stuck out to me because there are so many things going on. Doc shows how he is still stuck in his old ways, Val begins to become sad, and then this is all twisted when two mafia henchmen arrive to finish the job they believe Doc will not be able to do. Doc and Val take care of the henchmen and officially decide it is time to take care of the mafia boss.
To me, the cinematic elements of this film are not complex. Many critics have said that the cinematic elements bring this film down. There are many things the director tries to use. For instance, in the scene mentioned earlier, the director uses a mirror to foreshadow the next action but also to amplify the gravity of the moment. There is also the use of deep space composition various times throughout the film. The camera is shot from the ground up to show the view point of Val and Doc as they shoot upwards at the mafia boss in the final scene. overall, I did not feel the job by the director was anything special in this film but was not anything to bash either.
surge. Val quickly realizes that he is not the same as when he was younger. Meanwhile, Doc has orders to take out Val
from a mafia boss. Val was sent to prison because he had murdered the Mafia Boss' son accidentally during a robbery gone wrong. Doc does not want to kill Val, but has to do it on 24 hours. Val quickly realizes Doc's situation and is beginning to accept that he only has 24 hours left to live. The two try to come up with solutions while at dinner at a diner. At the diner, Val meets Doc's friend who is a waitress at the diner. Val learns that Doc is a regular customer at the diner. Later it is found out that the waitress is Doc's granddaughter but she does not know. Val and Doc meet up with some of the old crew and find a girl in the trunk of a car they stole. The girl explains she has been kidnapped by some "punks." Val and Doc decide to bring street justice to them. The enter in the guys compound where 5 men are staying. They eventually tie the men up and leave them to the women who now has a baseball bat. Afterwards, Doc and Val have bonded and there is now no way Doc can kill Val. The two decide to try to kill the mafia boss. Before the shootout, Doc leaves a letter for the waitress explaining the situation, and some money that he has left her.
I give this movie 3 out of 4 stars. The plot is interesting but the ending could have been better. Critics have a wide range of ratings on this film as well. This film is much different than typical Scorscese and Tarantino gangster films. Profanity and violence are not heavily used. The film tries to rely on plot to peak the viewers interest. I personally liked it because I am a fan of both Pacino and Walken. If you are not a fan of these two than this film would not be particularly interesting to you. I thought that as these two begin to get up in age, that is was cool that they made a movie about it but showed how they still have a roughness about them.
One scene that was particularly interesting to me, is the scene in which Walken and Pacino are picking out new suits. The two have broken into an expensive suit shop without tripping an alarm. They have all the time they need to pick out new suits. There is an irony about the situation. Pacino at this point is picking out what may be the clothes he dies in. Walken is resistant to change and is reluctant to pick out a new suit. This scene touches the emotions of the viewer because time is running out for Val. Val is beginning to become saddened by the situation and this emotion is extended to the viewer. This scene stuck out to me because there are so many things going on. Doc shows how he is still stuck in his old ways, Val begins to become sad, and then this is all twisted when two mafia henchmen arrive to finish the job they believe Doc will not be able to do. Doc and Val take care of the henchmen and officially decide it is time to take care of the mafia boss.
To me, the cinematic elements of this film are not complex. Many critics have said that the cinematic elements bring this film down. There are many things the director tries to use. For instance, in the scene mentioned earlier, the director uses a mirror to foreshadow the next action but also to amplify the gravity of the moment. There is also the use of deep space composition various times throughout the film. The camera is shot from the ground up to show the view point of Val and Doc as they shoot upwards at the mafia boss in the final scene. overall, I did not feel the job by the director was anything special in this film but was not anything to bash either.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
MYST Post #3- The Social Network
To me the key scene that stuck out is when Eduardo has realized that his role in the company has vanished and he approaches Mark angry. In this scene the camera is placed behind a sitting Mark facing up looking at a standing Eduardo. Eduardo's body language is easily seen to show his frustration for choosing Sean Parker (Justin Timberlake) over him. Mark does not seem very upset that he has lost one of his only friends however. That to me is the most interesting part.
MYST Post #2- Skyfall
This thrilling sequel to the James Bond series is interesting and entertaining. Daniel Craig plays bond brilliantly once again. This movie follows bond on a mission in the opening seem chasing what seems to be the main bad guy for the rest of the movie. However while in a scuffle on a train, his partner is forced to take a shot that puts Bond's life in jeopardy. Sure enough the bullet clips bond and sends him down a waterfall. Miraculously Bond lives. While the espionage world believes Bond is dead, Bond is secretly living on an island. Later, the federal building where Bond's agency's headquarters are is targeted by what is later found out to be a disgruntled former agent. This hits a nerve for Bond who returns to take down this former agent. Overall, this film was well done and my personal favorite of the twenty-three movies in the series. I give this film 4.5 out of 5 stars.The use of color throughout this film is something that stuck out to me. In every scene, the color pattern seemed to fit well with the tone of the scene. This gives the viewer an ability to focus on the content of the scene and the action instead of noticing needless things happening in the background. Throughout the entire film, each shot is made to make the movie flow well. I did not notice a single shot that seemes to be choppy or odd. overall, a great job by the crew.
To me, this film is shot similarly to Quantum of Solace. The main difference to me comes in the content. Particular scenes like the scene where bond has been captured and forced to shoot a shot glass off the top of an innocent women's head, is very intense and unpredictable. Being the unstoppable force that Bond is, the viewer expects Bond to save the innocent woman, but he cannot. He does however manage to escape the grip of the disgruntled agent and bring him in soon after. This is what I find great about this movie. It takes many twists and turns that are unpredictable. Skyfall was the topic action movie that I have seen in the last two years. Overall, strong performances all around.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)